iShares Global REIT ETF REET

El fondo busca seguir los resultados de inversión del índice FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REITs. El índice está diseñado para seguir el rendimiento de los fideicomisos de inversión en bienes raíces (REITs) cotizados en bolsa (o sus equivalentes locales) en mercados desarrollados y emergentes. El fondo generalmente invertirá al menos el 90% de sus activos en los valores componentes del índice subyacente y en inversiones que tengan características económicas sustancialmente idénticas a los valores componentes del índice subyacente y puede invertir hasta el 10% de sus activos en ciertos contratos de futuros, opciones y permutas financieras, efectivo y equivalentes al efectivo. El fondo no está diversificado.

Con 39 acciones de REET (USD 1.001,33) habrías recibido USD 36,66 en dividendos en los últimos 12 meses.

• The Motley Fool 2 sept

  iShares REET vs FlexShares GQRE: Which REIT Fund Wins?

  iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) emerges as the better choice for most investors, offering superior liquidity, lower expense ratio (0.14% vs 0.45%), and stronger 1-year performance (7.5% vs 11.2%). FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) appeals primarily to income-focused investors with its higher dividend yield of 4.3% versus 3.4%, though it carries higher volatility and lower historical returns.

  

• The Motley Fool 17 ago

  REET vs HAUZ: Which Real Estate ETF Is the Better Buy in 2026?

  iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) offer different approaches to real estate investing. REET provides global exposure including the U.S. market with a 16.7% one-year return, while HAUZ focuses on international markets with a lower 0.1% expense ratio and higher 3.6% dividend yield. REET is recommended as the better single real estate investment choice due to superior performance, though HAUZ suits investors seeking international diversification away from U.S. real estate.

  

• The Motley Fool 28 jul

  SCHH Offers Low-Cost U.S. REITs While REET Adds Global Reach

  The Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) provides a low-cost domestic REIT option with a 0.07% expense ratio, while the iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) offers broader diversification across developed and emerging markets at 0.14% expense ratio. REET offers higher dividend yield (3.36%) but comes with additional currency and regional risks, making the choice dependent on whether investors want simple U.S. exposure or global diversification.

  

• The Motley Fool 21 jul

  REET vs HAUZ: Global Real Estate ETF Showdown

  The iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) offer different approaches to real estate investing. REET includes U.S. exposure and delivered 19% returns over one year, while HAUZ focuses on international markets with a lower expense ratio (0.10% vs 0.14%) and higher dividend yield (3.57% vs 3.26%). REET has outperformed over both one- and five-year periods despite HAUZ's cost advantages, with both funds benefiting from stabilizing interest rates.

  

• The Motley Fool 14 jul

  Global REITs or U.S. Only: Which iShares ETF Is the Better Buy, REET or ICF?

  The article compares two iShares REIT ETFs: REET, which offers global diversification across 350+ holdings with a lower 0.14% expense ratio and 3.3% yield, versus ICF, which concentrates on 34 large U.S. REITs with a 0.32% expense ratio and 2.4% yield. REET is recommended for most long-term investors due to its lower costs, higher yield, and broader diversification, while ICF suits those seeking concentrated domestic REIT exposure.